Did You Know? It’s Never Too Late To Excercise

March 17, 2010 – 3:33 pm

Moderate excercise can extend life by at least a few years even for people in their mid- to late-80s, researchers at Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem found. In a long-term study of 1,861 seniors, the three-year survival rate was about three times higher for active 85-year-olds compared with those who were inactive. And they didn’t have to be a super-athlete to live longer; walking at least four hours weekly counted, even if it was just in 15-minute strolls a few times daily. Read more in this report on msnbc.com.

Statement from Israeli PM Netanyahu on the Resumption of the Diplomatic Process

March 17, 2010 – 2:53 pm

On March 16, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released the following statement (hyperlinks included):

The State of Israel appreciates and esteems US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s warm remarks regarding the deep bond between the United States and Israel and the US commitment to Israel’s security.

Regarding the commitment to peace: In the past year, the Government of Israel has proven its commitment to peace in both word and deed, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s 14 June 2009 Bar-Ilan University speech, the dismantling of hundreds of checkpoints and roadblocks in Judea and Samaria, and the decision to suspend new construction starts in Judea and Samaria for ten months, which Secy. of State Clinton defined as, “unprecedented.”

By contrast, the Palestinians have raised preconditions for the resumption of the diplomatic process, such as they have not done in the past 16 years. They are waging an assault to delegitimize Israel in international institutions via the Goldstone report. They are also continuing to incite towards hatred and violence; included in this is the decision to dedicate a square in Ramallah after the woman terrorist responsible for murdering 38 Israelis.

Prime Minister Netanyahu again calls on the Palestinians to enter into the tent of peace without preconditions because this is the only way to reach an agreement that will ensure peace, security and prosperity for both peoples.

Israel Update

March 16, 2010 – 1:53 pm

By Moshe Ronen, Chair, Canada-Israel Committee

I would like to provide some insights into the recent developments in Israel-US relations.  It is important to flag some key points for understanding the current situation.

Last week, during the visit to Jerusalem of US Vice President Biden, Israel’s interior ministry announced the approval of 1600 new housing units of the city’s Ramat Shlomo neighbourhood.  The timing of the announcement was an obvious error.  Prime Minister Netanyahu has been forthright and unequivocal in apologizing to Vice President Biden for the inappropriate circumstances surrounding the announcement.

The American reaction has been inappropriately harsh, given that the substance of the announcement did not violate the US-Israel understanding on settlement building. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s formulation of a 10-month settlement freeze in the West Bank, which excludes the Jerusalem municipality, was endorsed by the American administration and hailed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as an “unprecedented” step. The Ramat Shlomo neighbourhood straddles the Green Line and reflects the Israeli consensus that Jerusalem is a united city; it is not a settlement in the middle of the West Bank.

It is particularly distressing that a disagreement of this nature would distract the United States from confronting the urgent threat of Iranian nuclear proliferation. The harsh tone of the American reaction undermines Israel’s security and emboldens its enemies, leading them to believe that the strategic relationship between Israel and the US is significantly weakened.

Further, the intense focus on Israel ignores completely the Palestinian Authority’s glorification of terrorists (naming a square after a terrorist responsible for killing 37 civilians in a single operation) and incitement to violence,  particularly as it relates to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Putting all the onus on Israel is counterproductive and only serves to encourage these actions. In the coming days, as diplomatic tempers calm, there is hope that all parties, Israel, the Palestinians, and the United States as mediator, will rededicate themselves to a process leading to meaningful resolution of the conflict.

* * *

For further information and analysis please click here to read the Ha’aretz Middle East Security Survey, and here to read a more detailed report by Robert Satloff from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Jew Haters and ‘Free’ Speech by Lorrie Goldstein, Toronto Sun

March 15, 2010 – 3:53 pm

Here is a strong op-ed about Israel Apartheid Week:

Jew haters and ‘free’ speech
The Toronto District School Board has Israeli Apartheid Week figured out, unlike our universities

By Lorrie Goldstein, Senior Associate Editor
Toronto Sun, March 14

Common sense from educators when it comes to dealing with Jew haters and Jew baiters is so rare that when it happens, it should be applauded.

That occurred March 2 when Toronto District School Board education director Chris Spence, following a motion by Trustee James Pasternak and discussions with senior staff, issued the following statement regarding Israeli Apartheid Week.

“Our educational goal includes the building of understanding, trust and co-operation among groups and individuals in the TDSB. The event called ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ has the effect of fostering ill-will and disharmony among groups and individuals. The Government of Ontario and the opposition parties have unanimously adopted a resolution condemning ‘Israeli Apartheid Week.’ The Toronto District School Board therefore affirms that ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ and its activities are not permitted to take place on school or Board property, or as part of any activity under the jurisdiction of the TDSB.”

See? No muss, no fuss. No crazies screeching Jew-hating is protected by free speech.

Plus, the board now has a sensible precedent in place banning, should anyone ever propose them, an Islamic Terrorism Week, or Muslim Honour Killing Week, or Black Crime Week, or anything similarly malicious.

Admittedly, it’s easier for a school board to deal with Israeli Apartheid Week than a university because we agree children need to be protected from things adults don’t.

For example, if your colleague tells you the Holocaust was a hoax and he can prove it, he’s entitled to his repugnant views. However, if a Grade 6 history teacher says that to his class, there could and should be official sanctions against him.

Consequences

Those who argue this should fall under “free speech” don’t understand what it is. Free speech is the right to state your views without being censored, harassed, imprisoned, tortured or killed, but it doesn’t mean people are unaccountable for what they say, or for the context in which they say it. Speech has consequences.

Further, free speech isn’t absolute. You can’t falsely shout “fire” in a crowded theatre. You can’t libel or slander someone, in the sense they have civil remedies.

Under the Criminal Code, you can’t preach genocide or willfully promote hatred against an identifiable group, or threaten individuals.

The problem when universities deal with Israeli Apartheid Week — which started at the University of Toronto in 2005 and has spread to about 40 universities — is that their (usually) liberal administrations often disappear up their politically correct behinds defending “free speech.”

Free speech isn’t the issue. The appropriate use of publicly-funded institutions is.

At a university, the fact a group holds an Israeli Apartheid Week that may engage in one-sided attacks on Israel lacking context (i.e. security threats and terrorism) and that much of what is said is offensive to many Jews, and others, isn’t a valid reason to shut it down.

Free speech applies. Israel isn’t above criticism and universities are places where we especially value freedom of inquiry, debate and controversial, even offensive, views.

(Sadly, universities don’t have a stellar record of defending free speech when it matters. Say in Nazi Germany where many academics, far from resisting this appalling evil, became its apologists and scientists, conducting medical experiments that were actually torture.)

A university is a publicly-held trust and is accountable to society for how Israeli Apartheid Week (or anything else) is conducted. For example, that events are peaceful. That participants don’t threaten those who challenge their views or try to shut down their activities. (This also applies to those who oppose Israeli Apartheid Week.)

University administrators who defend “free speech” regarding IAW events, even as the cops have to be called in, miss the point.

Demanding, with sanctions, appropriate conduct from all members of the university community isn’t suppressing free speech — it’s doing their jobs. If they don’t do it, they’re shirking their responsibilities.

If anyone on campus defies reasonable standards of conduct, they can rent a room off campus, on their own dime, and Jew hate to their heart’s content.

But not at a publicly-funded university and not under the false flag of “free speech.”

News Release: CIC Commends the Conservative Party, the Liberal Party and the Bloc Quebecois for Denouncing Israeli Apartheid Week and Condemns the NDP for Refusing To Do So

March 12, 2010 – 1:34 pm

The CIC released the following news release today:

CIC Commends the Conservative Party, the Liberal Party and the Bloc Quebecois for Denouncing Israeli Apartheid Week and Condemns the NDP for Refusing To Do So

Ottawa, Ontario
March 12, 2010

The Canada-Israel Committee is deeply appreciative of the motion introduced in the House of Commons by Conservative MP Tim Uppal (Edmonton–Sherwood Park) – and supported by the Liberal Party – condemning ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’, an odious event that takes place annually on university and college campuses across Canada.

The CIC also notes a similar motion introduced by the Bloc Quebecois also denouncing the use of the term apartheid to describe Israel.

“The use of the term apartheid to describe Israel is scurrilous and completely false and serves to intimidate and ostracize Jewish students on campus. The attempt to compare Israel, a democracy that provides full rights to its Arab minority population, is part of a larger concerted campaign to delegitimize the State of Israel. The CIC is particularly grateful to Conservative Member of Parliament Tim Uppal for introducing and stewarding the government motion” stated Moshe Ronen, CIC National Chair.

Finally, Mr Ronen condemned the NDP’s House Leader Libby Davies for not only scuttling any good faith attempt to reach all-party consensus on the issue, but publicly taking credit for it.

“Libby Davies’ utter disregard for the plight of students who are bullied and intimidated on campus in Canada is staggering and unacceptable. This is not an issue of free speech. In fact, the Israel Apartheid Week stifles dialogue, does not constitute legitimate criticism and is simply hateful. Absent an unambiguous disavowal on the part of Jack Layton, the party’s leader, we will have to assume that her positions reflect NDP policy and draw our own conclusions”, stated Ronen.

U.S. Appears Naive as Syria Courts Iran

March 11, 2010 – 4:27 pm

In his weekly Canadian Jewish News media analysis column “According to Reports,” Paul Michaels, CIC Director of Communications, looks at coverage of the United States making overtures to Iran.

In “Fanning the winds of war” (Winnipeg Free Press, March 2) Samuel Segev wrote about how, following the appointment of Robert Ford as the first U.S. ambassador to Syria in five years, the Obama administration was counting on Damascus to distance itself from Tehran and to stop arms transfers to Hezbollah.  However, neither is remotely likely to happen. As a result, the United States appears to be naïve about the influence it can yield.

Syrian President Bashar Assad “has no incentive to weaken his ties to Tehran,” Segev noted.  “On the contrary, he believe[s] his continued ties to Tehran would only increase his value and would increase the American incentives.”  (Ford will assume his posting following U.S. Senate confirmation, which seems assured. Yet, apart from his presence lending prestige to Assad’s regime, it’s not clear what the United States gains.)

Assad underscored this determination to stand by Iran by hosting a summit late last month with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah – a meeting that featured prominent denunciations of both U.S. Mideast policy and, of course, Israel.  Moreover, in response  U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s calls on Damascus to free itself from Iran’s grip, Assad increased not only the quantity of Iranian arms to Hezbollah but also their quality, including advanced surface-to-surface missiles.

Segev quoted Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak, who spoke in Washington on Feb. 26: “Lebanon is a member of the UN and is also now a member of the UN Security Council. But Lebanon has also a ‘private’ army [Hezbollah], not subordinated to the state and this militia has an arsenal of 45,000 missiles and rockets that can hit targets anywhere in Israel. We cannot accept this.”

Israeli analysts have expressed surprise that the United States has been under some sort of illusion that Syria could be pried away from its alliance with Iran.  They point out that during previous negotiations with Israel, Syria never indicated its willingness to break this bond.  So why not take Syria at its word?

Assad is not the only one to assert his ties with Iran.  Damascus-based Hamas head Khaled Meshal has been moving closer to Iran.  Following the Damascus summit, he was Ahmadinejad’s guest of honour in Tehran  at a conference on ‘Islamic and National Solidarity with the Palestinian People,’  during which calls for Israel’s destruction figured prominently.  Hamas policy has consequently become even more extreme (Meshal, for instance, has renounced previous talk of a  long-term truce along the 1967 borders with Israel).

Into this toxic assembly of Assad, Meshal and Nasrallah – with Ahmadinejad and gang close at hand  – Ford plans to inject his presence.  And this comes at a time that the international community, including foremost the UN,  has all but given up on pursuing Assad as the prime suspect in the 2005 assassination of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri,  the event that prompted the United States to pull its ambassador from Damascus.

Providing an ostensibly different perspective, in “Report: Syria willing to consider gradual approach to peace” (Ha’aretz, Mar. 2),  Akiva Eldar related how Gabrielle Rifkind, a “conflict resolution specialist” with the Oxford Research Group,  told him that according to Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem, whom she met in Damascus last December, Syria is serious about peace with Israel.  This would involve stages of Israeli withdrawal from the Golan Heights in exchange for a “form of normalization” according to Rifkind.  This of course sounds very encouraging to western ears.

Yet on the crucial issue of Syria’s ties with Iran and Hezbollah Eldar wrote: “[Muallem] said that [Syria] will not negotiate any change in its relationship with Hezbollah and Hamas until after the Golan is returned. ‘Key questions, such as Syria’s support for Hamas, Hezbollah and its policy to Iran , would only be answered after withdrawal,’ [Muallem] said.”

Only after Israeli withdrawal?

In short, enough said.

* * *

No to be missed – from the Economist’s Feb. 27 “Lexington” column “Is Barack Obama tough enough?” about Obama’s policy of relying on drone attacks against in Pakistan:

“For some reason, his habit of blowing up alleged terrorists and bystanders from the air causes less global outrage than the smothering of a lone Hamas operative, allegedly by Israel, in a hotel room in Dubai.”

“Israel Is The Only Place In The Mideast I Can Live Openly Gay”

March 10, 2010 – 4:03 pm

Here is an interesting letter to the editor from the March 10 Ottawa Citizen:

Israel is a complicated country, without set borders, without clear distinctions between religion and nationality, without clear separation between church (or synagogue) and state.

It is a diverse society that fears for its life, forced to identify people who threaten its existence as enemies. It is paranoid to the point that it is hesitant to take some risks to achieve peace with its neighbours, paranoid that it often cannot accept criticism from those who tremendously care about it.

But as columnist Leonard Stern noticed about anti-Israel activism at Canadian universities, Israel is also the only country in the whole Middle East and surrounding region where I am able to live as an openly gay, human rights activist.

Israel is the only country in the region that I am not under threat of punishment or death because I am who I am. It is the only place within a thousand miles where no one can fire me because of who I am. True, Israel does not yet have same-sex marriage, but it is the place among 20 countries in the region where the courts have provided great protection for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered rights (LGBT), both personal and as couples.

Israel is the only country in the region that could send a transgender singer to represent it in the European song contest and rejoice with her in the streets when she honoured the country with the first prize.

Israel’s gay rights movement is a model of how much can be achieved through persistent dialogue. Sometimes hard, at times frustrating, but never stopping. We criticize the Palestinian Authority for its treatment of LGBT people, and we criticize the Israeli government over its hesitation to give humanitarian aid to Palestinians who escape the death threats of an Islamic homophobic society in Gaza and the West Bank.

The LGBT community can be a bridge, perhaps small, but solid, between Israelis and Palestinians. Accusations and boycotts serve no purpose in building bridges. Knowing each other, looking at our faces, into our eyes and souls, we are determined to keep talking, no matter what. This can be the LGBT community contribution.

Mike Hamel,

Tel Aviv, Israel

The writer is chairperson of the Aguda, Israel’s leading gay rights organization.

Did You Know? Israel Tourism Enjoys Record-Breaking February

March 10, 2010 – 3:45 pm

Tourism to Israel continues to grow. In February, Israel welcomed a record-breaking 222,000 visitors, the highest number of tourists in a single month in Israel’s history. In the first two months of 2010, 434,300 tourists visited Israel, compared with 283,400 visitors in the first two months of 2009. You can read more in Globes.

Joint Press Conference With Israeli PM Netanyahu and US VP Biden

March 9, 2010 – 4:30 pm

Here is the transcript of the March 8 press conference given by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US Vice President Joe Biden, during Biden’s trip to Israel:

Prime Minister Netanyahu: Vice President Biden, Joe, welcome to Israel and welcome to Jerusalem.  We’ve been personal friends for almost three decades.  Can you believe it’s been that long?

Vice President Biden: No, you’re getting older, Bibi.  I don’t know…

Prime Minister Netanyahu: And you remain younger all the time.  And in all that time you’ve been a real friend to me and a real friend to Israel and to the Jewish people and you’ve come to Israel many times since you came here first on the eve of the Yom Kippur War.  But now you’re coming as the Vice President of the United States of America and this is deeply appreciated and for me deeply moving.

President Obama has said in Cairo and he’s repeated this many times since that the bonds between Israel and the United States are unbreakable and he has shown that, in the last year in things that are known to the public and in some things that are not known to the public: in pursuing for example the joint military exercises for military defense between the Israeli Army and the American military, in securing Israel’s qualitative military edge, and in many other activities along the world scene including the battle against the infamous Goldstone report.  I think that the bonds exactly as President Obama has said, the bonds are unbreakable.  And your visit demonstrates how strong they are.  I think this unbreakable bond will help our two countries meet the two historic challenges that we face today in the Middle East.

The first and foremost among them is the need to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and the second is the need to advance a secure peace between Israel and our Palestinian and other Arab neighbors.  I very much appreciate the efforts of President Obama and the American Government to lead the international community to place top sanctions on Iran.  The stronger those sanctions are, the more likely will be that the Iranian regime will have to choose between advancing its nuclear program and advancing the future of its own permanence.  I think that the international community and the leading countries of the international community have to join the American effort and Israel has been helping out with key countries and will continue to do so.

I also appreciate the Administration’s effort to advance peace in the region.  I know that this has been difficult and has required a great deal of patience, but I’m pleased that these efforts are beginning to bear fruit and we have to be persistent and purposeful in making sure that we get to those direct negotiations that will enable us to resolve this conflict.

I look forward to working with President Obama, and with you and your entire Administration to forge an historic peace agreement in which the permanence and legitimacy of the Jewish State of Israel is recognized by our Palestinian neighbors and in which Israel’s security is guaranteed for generations to come.

Again, Vice President, my friend Joe, it’s a pleasure to welcome you to Jerusalem.  Welcome.

Vice President Biden: Thank you very much.  Mr. Prime Minister, it’s a pleasure to be back.  It’s been too long between visits here and it is true that you and I have been friends a long, long time and a matter of fact, when each of us were in the minority, occasionally I’d get a phone call at home and I’d call you as well to get a sense of what’s going on.  Our friendship is real, but what’s even deeper is the relationship between the United States and Israel.

Mr. Prime Minister, I’m sure you’d agree, we had a very productive discussion spanning a wide range of issues that affect both our nations.  The relationship between Israel and the United States has been and will continue to be a centerpiece – a centerpiece of American policy and it’s been that way since Israel’s founding in 1948.  And quite frankly, it was a major focus of my work for all those years as a United States Senator and Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.  Our two countries are bound by historic and cultural ties and so many shared interests that it would take too long to enumerate and also by a wide range of deep seated personal relationships and friendships that span the time even before 1948.

Our ties have been strengthened by our deep cooperation in many fields including science and economic development and a range of other policy areas as well, but the cornerstone of the relationship is our absolute total unvarnished commitment to Israel’s security.  Bibi, you heard me say before, progress occurs in the Middle East when everyone knows there’s simply no space between the United States and Israel.  There is no space between the United States and Israel when it comes to Israel’s security and for that reason and many others addressing Iran’s nuclear program has been one of our Administration’s priorities.  We’re determined.  We’re determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and we’re working with many countries around the world to convince Teheran to meet its international obligations and cease and desist.   Iran must also curb its other destabilizing actions in the region, well beyond their desire to acquire nuclear weapons and that is their continued support for terrorist groups that threaten Israel and I might add our interest as well.

President Obama and I strongly believe that the best long-term guarantee for Israel’s security is a comprehensive Middle East peace with the Palestinians, with the Syrians, with Lebanon, and leading eventually to full and normalized relationships with the entire Arab world.  It’s overwhelming in the interest of Israel, but it’s also overwhelming interest to the Arab world and it’s in our interest as well.

And so Mr. Prime Minister, toward that end, I’m very pleased that you and the Palestinian leadership have agreed to launch indirect talks.  We hope that these talks will lead and they must lead eventually to negotiations and direct discussions between the parties.  The goal is obviously to resolve the final status issues to achieve a two-state solution with Israel and a Palestine living side by side in peace and security. An historic peace is going to require both parties to make some historically bold commitments.  You have done it before and I’m confident for real peace you would do it again.  Over the last year, Mr. Prime Minister, you have taken significant steps, including the moratorium that has limited new settlement construction activity and you have significantly increased freedom of movement across the West Bank.

Palestinian leaders are beginning to make progress on their determined willingness to – especially their efforts to reform their institutions of government and with their security force – their security forces becoming much more reliable.  It’s easy to point fingers particularly in this part of the world at what each side has not done.  But it’s also important to give credit where things have been done in order to be able to move forward.

Mr. Prime Minister, the United States will always stand with those who take risks for peace and you’re prepared to do that and I am hopeful and I’ll be having discussions with Palestinian leaders.  It is my hope and expectation that they will be prepared as well.  The proximity talks are just that, a start.  They are not designed to finish the process and so Mr. Prime Minister I thank you for all the time you’ve given me and it’s just quite frankly good to be back in your company and see you again.

Prime Minister Netanyahu: Thank you.  Thank you Joe.  I have one thing to offer you right now and it’s broken glass, so what I’m going to do is I’m going to sign but I need a pen.

Now, this is a significant piece of paper.  I will say that agreements are dependent on the arrangements not on paper, but on the ground.  Here’s a piece of paper that reflects an arrangement on the ground.  We have planted a circle of trees in Jerusalem in memory of your mother; Catherine Eugenia Finnegan Biden because you have said many times that she was a source of immeasurable strength which I recognize in you, Joe.  We planted a tree to serve as a tribute, a circle of trees next to the leaders of the nations.  We have a forest of the leaders of the nations and right next to it are the trees that we have planted in memory of your mother as a tribute to her immeasurable strength and I want to offer it to you on your visit to Israel.

Vice President Biden: Well, thank you very much.  If you don’t mind my saying Mr. Prime Minister, my love for your country was watered by this Irish lady who was proudest of me when I was working with and for the security of Israel, so it’s a great honor.  Thank you very much.

 

Bill would reward parties that boast more women

March 8, 2010 – 4:01 pm

Great story on International Women’s Day. Israel working to get more women in its parliament (Knesset).

Bill would reward parties that boast more women

By Mazal Mualem
Haaretz: March 8, 2010

Efforts to increase the number of female Knesset members have frequently been stymied by ultra-Orthodox parties, but a new bill proposed ahead of today’s celebration of International Women’s Day could change that.

Unlike previous bills, the proposal by MKs Einat Wilf (Labor) and Tzipi Hotovely (Likud), doesn’t aim to impose sanctions on parties with all-male parliamentary representation.

Instead, it offers a NIS 5.5 million payout for any party with a Knesset slate that is 35 percent female on the day the MKs are sworn in. The bill would amend a law that grants more limited funding to parties that meet that criterion.

The proposal will be valid only while female representation in the Knesset remains below 40 percent.

“The modern world strives to achieve equal rights between the sexes in every venture of life,” said Hotovely, who heads the Knesset Committee on the Status of Women. “Thus it is worthwhile to act toward a significant inclusion of women in the political field by encouraging parties that o have high percentages.”

None of the parties in the Knesset have reached the 35 percent threshold. Of the 120 seats in parliament, 23 are occupied by women. That number is expected to drop to 22 in the next few weeks once MK Yuli Tamir’s resignation takes effect. The Labor Party veteran will be replaced by Raleb Majadele.

There has not been a significant change in the number of female MKs in recent years. While women made up just 15 percent of the previous Knesset, parliaments in several other countries established quotas for female representation. They offered parties financial incentives as well as penalties for failure to meet minimums.

But in Israel, the absence of penalties could make the proposal more successful than its predecessors since it might not be thwarted by the ultra-Orthodox parties.

Shas MKs said they would consider refraining from objecting to the law.

Wilf said the bill does not seek to impose any requirements on parties.

“These type of law proved themselves overseas as an effective tool to buttress equality between the genders,” Wilf said. Earlier this decade, France passed a law that levied a fine against political parties that don’t have the same number of male and female candidates. Other countries that have instituted stringent requirements for equal representation include Argentina, Belgium, Italy, Nepal and Uganda.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1154843.html